Experimental Chemistry

Take a minute to write an introduction that is short, sweet, and to the point.

  • Compare the synthesis efficiency of Tacrine to evaluate its potential as an AChE inhibitor.

  • Compare PCR-amplified DNA profiles to assess the accuracy of DNA fingerprinting.

  • Objective: Compare the yield and purity of aspirin synthesized using different catalysts or reaction conditions.

    • Methodology:

      • Synthesized aspirin via the esterification of salicylic acid with acetic anhydride, using sulfuric acid vs. phosphoric acid as catalysts.

      • Conducted thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and melting point analysis to assess purity.

      • Used UV-Vis spectroscopy and titration to quantify salicylic acid contamination.

    • Findings:

      • Phosphoric acid yielded a higher purity product with a melting point closer to 135°C, while sulfuric acid led to higher impurity levels.

      • Yield efficiency varied, with phosphoric acid giving 85% yield compared to 78% with sulfuric acid.

    • Conclusion:

      • The choice of catalyst significantly affects yield and purity, impacting pharmaceutical-grade aspirin production.

  • Objective: Extract and purify caffeine from tea leaves, comparing the efficiency of different solvents.

    • Methodology:

      • Used liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane vs. ethyl acetate to isolate caffeine.

      • Recrystallized the product and confirmed purity using IR spectroscopy and melting point analysis.

    • Findings:

      • Dichloromethane extracted a higher yield (65%) but contained more impurities than ethyl acetate (50% yield).

      • IR spectroscopy confirmed caffeine peaks at 1650 cm⁻¹ (C=O) and 2950 cm⁻¹ (N-H stretch).

    • Conclusion:

      • Extraction solvent selection influences yield and purity, impacting efficiency in pharmaceutical or energy drink formulations.

  • Objective: Synthesize paracetamol (acetaminophen) using greener solvents to evaluate environmental impact and yield.

    • Methodology:

      • Traditional method: Used acetic anhydride and p-aminophenol.

      • Green method: Replaced acetic anhydride with acetic acid and varied reaction temperatures.

      • Analyzed product via HPLC and NMR spectroscopy.

    • Findings:

      • Green synthesis led to lower yield (65% vs. 85%) but reduced waste production.

      • HPLC confirmed 99% purity in traditional synthesis vs. 92% in green synthesis.

    • Conclusion:

      • While greener methods improve sustainability, optimization is needed to balance yield and purity for industrial applications.

  • Objective: Measure the rate of bromination of different alkenes and determine how electron density affects reaction speed.

    • Methodology:

      • Conducted bromination of cyclohexene, styrene, and trans-stilbene in chloroform.

      • Monitored reaction progress using UV-Vis spectroscopy.

      • Used NMR to confirm product formation.

    • Findings:

      • Styrene reacted fastest due to electron-donating benzene ring stabilization.

      • Trans-stilbene reacted slower due to steric hindrance.

    • Conclusion:

      • Reactivity correlates with alkene electron density, important for industrial halogenation processes.

  • Objective: Convert vanillin to L-DOPA, a precursor to dopamine-based drugs, optimizing reaction conditions.

    • Methodology:

      • Three-step synthesis including oxidation, nitration, and hydrogenation.

      • Used column chromatography for purification and HPLC for quantification.

    • Findings:

      • Highest yield achieved at 78% with palladium-catalyzed hydrogenation.

      • Purity confirmed via 1H NMR showing correct aromatic shifts.

    • Conclusion:

      • Efficient synthesis of L-DOPA from natural precursors presents potential for sustainable pharmaceutical production.

Computational Chemistry & Bioinformatics

Take a minute to write an introduction that is short, sweet, and to the point.

  • Objective: Investigate the molecular docking of tamoxifen to identify its binding interactions with the estrogen receptor (ER) and assess its potential as an inhibitor.

    Key Points:

    • Used AutoDock Vina to dock tamoxifen into the active site of the estrogen receptor (ERα).

    • Best docking pose exhibited a binding energy of -8.7 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Glu353 and Arg394, along with hydrophobic interactions stabilizing the complex.

    • Conducted Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to evaluate the stability of the tamoxifen-ERα complex over 100 ns.

    Conclusion: Results confirm strong binding interactions, supporting tamoxifen’s established role as a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and providing insights for further structure-based drug optimization.

  • Objective: Perform a computational study to evaluate the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations.

    Key Points:

    • Used AutoDock Vina to dock a library of small molecules into the AChE active site.

    • Best scoring compound exhibited a binding energy of -10.4 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Ser203 and His447, key residues in the catalytic triad.

    • Conducted Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to assess the stability of the ligand-enzyme complex over 100 ns.

    Conclusion: Identified promising AChE inhibitors with stable binding interactions, supporting their potential for further in vitro validation in neurodegenerative disease research.

  • Objective: Perform a virtual screening study to identify potential kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations.

    Key Points:

    • Used AutoDock Vina to screen a library of kinase inhibitors against the ATP-binding site of a target kinase.

    • Top-ranked compounds exhibited binding energies below -9.5 kcal/mol, forming key hydrogen bonds with hinge-region residues and additional stabilizing hydrophobic interactions.

    • Followed up with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to evaluate the stability and conformational dynamics of the ligand-kinase complexes over 100 ns.

    Conclusion: Identified lead kinase inhibitors with strong and stable binding, providing promising candidates for further in vitro validation and structure-based drug design.

  • Objective: Investigate the binding interactions of antibiotics with bacterial DNA gyrase to identify potential inhibitors.

    Key Points:

    • Used AutoDock Vina to dock a library of fluoroquinolone antibiotics into the active site of DNA gyrase.

    • Best docking pose showed a binding energy of -8.9 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Asp426 and Ser531, key residues in DNA binding.

    • Conducted Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to assess ligand stability and flexibility.

    Conclusion: Results highlight potent inhibitors for further optimization and in vitro testing against resistant bacterial strains.

  • Objective: Analyze the molecular interactions between GPCRs and potential drug candidates using docking and MD simulations.

    Key Points:

    • Utilized AutoDock Vina to dock small molecules into the orthosteric binding site of a GPCR model.

    • Top hit exhibited a binding energy of -10.1 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Asp113 and Tyr185, critical for receptor activation.

    • Performed Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to evaluate receptor-ligand stability and conformational changes.

    Conclusion: Findings provide insights into GPCR-targeted drug design and candidate selection for experimental validation.

  • Objective: Screen a database of natural compounds for potential anticancer activity by targeting a key oncogenic protein.

    Key Points:

    • Conducted high-throughput virtual screening using AutoDock Vina against the active site of EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor).

    • Lead compound demonstrated a binding energy of -9.7 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Met793 and Glu762.

    • Followed up with Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to assess stability and ligand-induced conformational shifts.

    Conclusion: Identified promising natural inhibitors for further evaluation in preclinical studies.

  • Objective: Explore the binding interactions and pharmacokinetics of potential anti-inflammatory compounds.

    Key Points:

    • Used AutoDock Vina to dock NSAIDs into the active site of COX-2 (Cyclooxygenase-2).

    • Best compound had a binding energy of -8.5 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Arg120 and Tyr355.

    • Conducted ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) analysis using SwissADME and pkCSM tools.

    Conclusion: Selected compounds with strong binding affinity and favorable pharmacokinetics for further drug development.

  • Objective: Identify novel inhibitors targeting the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 using computational methods.

    Key Points:

    • Screened a library of antiviral compounds using AutoDock Vina to dock them into the catalytic site of Mpro.

    • Best inhibitor displayed a binding energy of -9.2 kcal/mol, forming hydrogen bonds with Cys145 and His41.

    • Conducted Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations using GROMACS to assess binding stability over 100 ns.

    Conclusion: Identified lead compounds for further in vitro and in vivo antiviral testing.

  • Objective: Use molecular docking and MM-PBSA calculations to estimate ligand binding affinity to a drug target.

    Key Points:

    • Performed AutoDock Vina docking on a series of inhibitors targeting a kinase active site.

    • Selected the top three hits based on binding energy and interaction analysis.

    • Carried out MM-PBSA (Molecular Mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area) calculations in GROMACS to determine binding free energy.

    Conclusion: Results provided a ranking of inhibitors based on thermodynamic stability, guiding future lead optimization efforts.

Techniques and Skills

Laboratory Skills

  • ELISA, PCR, qPCR, spectrophotometry, enzyme activity assays

  • Collection and processing of blood, tissue, and urine samples

  • IR, NMR, UV-Vis, Mass Spectrometry, fluorescence spectroscopy

  • Protein detection and quantification

  • Protein and nucleic acid separation

  • Compound separation and analysis

  • Structural determination of compounds

  • Studying material stability

Technical Skills

  • Python (6+ years), R, JavaScript, SQL

  • MOE, AutoDock, Chimera, PyMOL, EPI2ME, BLAST, GATK, VCFtools, BEDtools

  • GROMACS, AMBER, AutoDock Vina, molecular dynamics simulations, protein-ligand docking, ligand-based virtual screening

  • TensorFlow, Keras, Scikit-learn, Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, deep learning for bioinformatics, neural networks for drug prediction

  • R (dplyr, ggplot2), Python (Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib, Seaborn), survival analysis, Cox regression

  • Data preprocessing, variant calling, RNA-seq, DNA-seq, WES, transcriptome analysis

  • Principal component analysis (PCA), clustering algorithms (k-means, hierarchical), heatmaps, Volcano plots, bioinformatics data pipelines

  • AWS, Google Cloud, Docker, Kubernetes, cloud bioinformatics workflows, distributed computing

  • SQL, NoSQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, cloud databases, data pipelines

  • Jupyter Notebooks, GitHub (version control), development of bioinformatics tools, scripting for automation

Soft Skills

  • Scientific authoring (research papers, grants, presentations), succinct and lucid documentation, ability to articulate technical concepts to non-technical individuals

  • Inter-functional team working in research and clinical settings, familiarity working with cross-disciplinary teams

  • Strong analytical acumen for gap identification in research, troubleshooting bugs in computational biology

  • Managing simultaneous projects with effective time management, delivering within timelines, agile development

  • Leading research initiatives, mentoring junior researchers, presenting findings at meetings and conferences

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Our Values

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Good work takes time.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.