The work, and what it can support.
· Each one carries a status label, so nothing reads as finished research unless it is. Published projects state their limitations as prominently as their findings, and proposals have no results section because they have no results.
Four of these analyses build into one argument
The pharmacogenomics projects are small individually. Together they make a single point about evidence layers — and the two cases where a layer boundary fails silently. The programme page sets out the synthesis, and what is still missing from it.
- Published analyses 4
- Evidence layers 5
- Gaps stated openly 4
Where I'd take this next.
Research concepts written independently and not yet undertaken. They are here so a supervisor has something concrete to disagree with. Each states the question, the approach, and the part I expect to be genuinely difficult — several grew out of gaps I hit in my own published work.